Connect with us

Politics

Wisconsin AG argues letting disabled people vote electronically at home would create confusion

Published

on

FILE - In this Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020, file photo, poll workers sort out early and absentee ballots at the Kenosha Municipal building on Election Day, in Kenosha, Wis. (AP Photo/Wong Maye-E, File)

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin’s Democratic attorney general pushed back Monday against a request to let people with disabilities vote electronically from home this fall.

Attorney General Josh Kaul’s attorneys told Dane County Circuit Judge Everett Mitchell during a hearing that the move would create confusion and security risks. They also argued state election officials don’t have time to teach hundreds of local clerks how to implement the change before the November presidential election.

“This court cannot change the rules of the election now … regardless of how hard or easy it is to make those changes,” Assistant Attorney General Karla Keckhaver told the judge.

The hearing was part of a lawsuit Disability Rights Wisconsin, the League of Women Voters and four disabled people filed in April. They contend many people with disabilities can’t cast paper ballots without assistance, violating their right to cast a secret ballot.

The plaintiffs want Mitchell to allow disabled people to request and cast absentee ballots electronically using devices that help them read and write independently. They also want the judge to let them send ballots back to clerks electronically rather than through the mail.

They point out that military and overseas voters are permitted to request absentee ballots electronically in Wisconsin elections and mail them back. Not allowing disabled people the same accommodation places a “severe burden” on them, Erin Deeley, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys, argued during the hearing.

Any eligible voter can vote by paper absentee ballot in Wisconsin. Democrats have pushed to make the process easier the past several years, while Republicans have tried to limit it. Anyone in Wisconsin was allowed to request an absentee ballot electronically from home and mail it back to clerks until 2011, when then-Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican, signed a bill that allowed only military and overseas voters to use that method.

The plaintiffs initially requested a temporary injunction that would have implemented electronic absentee voting and ballot return for disabled voters during the state’s Aug. 13 primary and November presidential election. They revised the request just before the hearing, asking that the accommodation apply only during the November election for voters who can’t independently read or mark a paper ballot. The plaintiffs made the move after Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe testified last week that the agency would need three months to implement the change.

Keckhaver told Mitchell that an injunction would create confusion for the state’s roughly 1,800 clerks, who are currently busy preparing for the August primary. The elections commission wouldn’t have enough time to train them before November, leaving them unsure how to verify whether a voter is disabled.

She added that many local clerks don’t use government email systems, leaving their emails vulnerable to hacking and disabled voters confused about whether the ballots they receive are official.

As for the secret ballot argument, Keckhaver pointed out that disabled people’s assistants could be subject to criminal penalties if they divulge a person’s vote. Disabled people can also vote using special machines at the polls, Keckhaver added.

“The plaintiffs aren’t being forced to forfeit their right to vote,” she said. “They can vote the way they always have.”

Deeley countered that Keckhaver has provided no evidence of security vulnerabilities in the military and overseas voter systems. Jared Grubow, another attorney for the plaintiffs, added that disabled voters can easily verify their local clerks’ emails.

Mitchell said he would decide within the next few days whether to issue the injunction.

Questions over who can cast absentee ballots and how have become a political flashpoint in Wisconsin, where four of the past six presidential elections have been decided by less than a percentage point.

People with disabilities make up about a quarter of the U.S. adult population, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A little more than a million Wisconsin adults, or one in four, are disabled, defined by the CDC as having difficulty with mobility, cognition, independent living, hearing, seeing, dressing or bathing.

Disabled people have engaged in several legal battles in recent years over access to the polls, as many Republican-led states have restricted how and when people can vote. Among the issues they have fought are limits on the types of assistance a voter can receive and whether someone else can return a voter’s mailed ballot.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Kevin

    June 27, 2024 at 6:50 am

    no, no, no – a thousand times no! WHY, when our methods of voting, and counting those votes is under such high scrutiny would you try to introduce another avenue for cheating, and fraud? experts have said that the increased absentee voting, and the methods to vote, and the methods to get out the vote, coupled with our amazing willingness to ignore laws we don’t like, illegal immigration, THEN we provide legal documents to those illegal immigrants, driver licenses, and we open our ‘local’ elections to those illegals…..ARE WE STUPID? Yes, the answer is yes, we have an intellectually impaired president, we know it, we can see it, we can hear it, and the talking heads in the media and partisan minions are vomiting out such things, as, Joe has a stutter, Joe has a bad back, Joe talks too fast…. Truth, Joe is old, Joe has dementia, Joe is a liar, Joe is all kinds of indecent things, but we don’t care, we want to kill babies, and we want to provide big business cheap labor, and we want to break the back of the national spirit of America, SO WE WILL DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO CORRUPT THE VOTING SYSTEM…..under the guise of fairness and equity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *